Example: Cross-check vantages (EXPERIMENTAL)¶
EXPERIMENTAL · opt-in: host must start with
OCCAM_CONSENSUS_MCP=1. Tool absent from defaulttools/list.
Compare HTTP vs browser (and optional session) vantages on the same URL. Use when you suspect cloaking, personalization, or access-walling — not for ordinary reads.
{
"name": "occam_crosscheck",
"arguments": {
"url": "https://news.example/story",
"vantages": "http,browser"
}
}
With authenticated comparison:
{
"name": "occam_crosscheck",
"arguments": {
"url": "https://news.example/story",
"session_profile": "news-example"
}
}
Verdict honesty¶
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
consensus |
Vantages agreed on content — agreement ≠ correctness |
divergent |
Materially different content between vantages |
access_divergent |
Some vantages walled, others succeeded |
Each vantage extract may carry a signed Receipt v1. The agreement verdict is computed, not signed — do not describe crosscheck as "consensus proof."
Runs 2+ full extracts per call (expensive).